Legal Opinion

Edith Schneider and Herman Schneider v. Emanuel Revici, M.D., and Institute of Applied Biology, Inc., Defendants

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 30, 1987No. 585, Docket 86-7145PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Emanuel Revici, M.D. and the Institute of Applied Biology, Inc. (the “Institute”) appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Motley, J.), in a diversity action arising from Dr. Revici’s treatment of plaintiff Edith Schneider’s breast cancer with unconventional, non-invasive cancer therapy, after she had been advised by numerous doctors to undergo a biopsy and had refused to do so. Edith Schneider and her husband asserted four claims against Dr. Revici and the Institute: (1) fraud, premised on Dr. Revici’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru KamiyamaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Roger L. Baker v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. American Prairie Construction Co. v. HoichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Brady, M. v. Urbas D.P.M., W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API