Legal Opinion
United States v. Goward
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 17, 2010No. Case 02-20043-BCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant David Goward’s motion to enlarge the time within which he might file a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Go-ward was resentenced on May 27, 2009. He filed a timely notice of appeal, but his appeal was voluntarily dismissed by the Sixth Circuit on October 29, 2009. He has not sought further review since then.
On May 24, 2010, Goward filed a motion to enlarge the time for filing a motion under section 2255 by “90-120 days.” He alleges that he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Horace Lee Dunlap v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Manuel Sanchez-Castellano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Thomas Barrow v. Lloyd A. Falck, Individually and as Sheriff of Ford County, Illinois, and Ford County, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Timmy Kinner v. Director Idaho D.O.C., Idaho Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020