Legal Opinion

Arthur K. Whitcomb v. Pension Development Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 31, 1986No. 86-1232PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Arthur Whitcomb, Lena Whit-comb, and Arthur Whitcomb, Inc. appeal from a judgment granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Pension Development Co., Inc. (“Pension”), Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. (“Provident”), and Spurgeon S. Steeves (“Steeves”). The district court held that plaintiffs’ diversity action was barred by the applicable Massachusetts state statutes of limitations. We affirm.

In 1974, Arthur Whitcomb and other officers of Whitcomb, Inc. met with Steeves, the principal officer and shareholder of Pension, to discuss adoption of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. Peabody Construction Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Olsen v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Frank Cooke, Inc. v. HurwitzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. International Mobiles Corp. v. Corroon & Black/Fairfield & Ellis, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  2. Cantu v. St. Paul CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. George Cornell v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. A. Greer Edwards, Jr. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Kennedy v. GoffsteinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API