Kennedy v. Goffstein
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.
At issue is when the statute of limitations commenced on a malpractice claim against a certified public accountant. The statute begins to run at the point when the plaintiff discovers that he has suffered harm due to the actions of the defendant. See Lyons v. Nutt, 436 Mass. 244, 247 (2002). The specific date that “the necessary coalescence of discovery and appreciable harm occur[s],” id. at 251, quoting from Cantu v. St. Paul Cos., 401 Mass. 53, 57 (1987), is a factual question, which, in this case, should have been submitted to the jury. As it was not, we reverse.
Background. In 1993, Brian…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- RTR Technologies, Inc. v. HelmingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLPCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Frankston v. DennistonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Massachusetts v. Mylan LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Vinci v. ByersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.