Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 8, 1985No. 83-709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

Appeal by Mrs. Bettie Murphy from an adverse judgment in her declaratory judgment action which determined the beneficiary of certain pension plan death benefits of her late husband, Nasren Murphy, Jr. That judgment declared that Mary Gibson, defendant-appellee, was the lawful beneficiary of those benefits. We affirm.

The plaintiff, Bettie Murphy, married Nasren Murphy, Jr., on January 25, 1979. At that time, her husband was employed at Wood-Fruitticher Grocery Company, where he was employed as a delivery man until his death on June 3, 1983.

*375The evidence at the ensuing non-jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Trabits v. First National Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Hutchins v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Herbert v. HaggermakerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coley v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Ernst v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
  3. Baxley v. Jackson National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company v. Lynch et al.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
  5. Montiel v. ESTATE OF MONTIELCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API