State v. Cook
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of ten counts of forgery contrary to § 30-16-10, N.M.S.A.1978. His first point for reversal is dispositive — whether under the facts he could be convicted of forgery. We reverse.
Facts
Defendant was indicted by the Bernalillo County Grand Jury on ten counts of forgery contrary to § 30-16-10, supra, or in the alternative, on ten counts of issuing worthless checks contrary to § 30-36-4, N.M.S.A. 1978. At the close of all the evidence, the State elected to send only the forgery counts to the jury. Defendant objected and renewed his motion for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Rapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AitkenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. AitkenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. CookNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979