Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1979No. 3800PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of ten counts of forgery contrary to § 30-16-10, N.M.S.A.1978. His first point for reversal is dispositive — whether under the facts he could be convicted of forgery. We reverse.

Facts

Defendant was indicted by the Bernalillo County Grand Jury on ten counts of forgery contrary to § 30-16-10, supra, or in the alternative, on ten counts of issuing worthless checks contrary to § 30-36-4, N.M.S.A. 1978. At the close of all the evidence, the State elected to send only the forgery counts to the jury. Defendant objected and renewed his motion for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Rapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AitkenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. AitkenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. CookNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API