Legal Opinion

Narron v. Cincinnati Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 14, 2003No. 88,787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Carolyn Narron, who sought underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage from her Cincinnati automobile insurance policy. We reverse.

In January 1998, Narron was driving a vehicle owned by her parents, Milbum and Mildred Chestnut. Narron’s parents were passengers. The vehicle was struck by a vehicle driven by Arnold Pinto, and it is undisputed that Pinto was solely liable for the accident. Mildred Chestnut was killed. Narron suffered severe injuries. Narron’s medical bills are estimated to be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. American Media, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Koch, Administratrix v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Narron v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. Perez-MoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Deutsch v. BITCO General Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API