Legal Opinion

Kaheana v. Nalimu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

At the special term of this Court, March, 1891, we held that the defendant had complied with the statute and rules respecting the perfecting of motions for new trials, and ordered the parties to be heard on the merits of the motion. (Ante, page 227.)

Mr. Justice Dole heard the motion in vacation, and on the 3d July filed his decision overruling the same, to which exceptions were taken by defendant, and the matter was argued before the Court in Banco.

Having examined the evidence in the case and the affidavits on file, we are of the opinion that the decision and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Territory v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Uuku v. KaioHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Deponte v. Ulupalakua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Republic of Hawaii v. CarvalhoHawaii Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API