Legal Opinion

Rodrigo v. Carle Foundation Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 2, 2018No. 16-1403PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rovner, Circuit Judge.

Yasas Rodrigo sued his employer, Carle Foundation Hospital (“Carle”), for violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“Act”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Carle on Rodrigo’s claims for disability discrimination, failure to provide a reasonable accommodation, and retaliation. Rodrigo appeals and we affirm.

I

Rodrigo was a resident in Carle’s Family Medicine Residency Program (“Program”) beginning in July 2010. Medical residency programs provide training to medical school graduates who are seeking to become…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Terrence Preddie v. Bartholomew Consolidated SchoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Michael Stern v. St. Anthony's Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Miller v. Illinois Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Linda Rowlands v. United Parcel Service, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Priscilla Conners v. Robert WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Janet Kotaska v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Ayesha Khan v. Midwestern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Cloutier v. Gojet Airlines, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API