Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Direct Impact Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 14, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-1250-APublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, motion for a new trial under Rule 59(a)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, these motions are DENIED.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Jeffrey Thompson, claimed that the defendant, Direct Impact Company (“the Company”), orally modified an Employment Agreement between…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Price v. City of Charlotte, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Aero & Naval SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Durkin v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
- Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Incorporated v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- X-It Products, LLC v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Employee Resource Management, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
- PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ross Development Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Dnt, LLC v. Sprint Spectrum, LpDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- In Re Cable & Wireless, PLC, Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.