Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Twenty-Sixth Legislature

Superior Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided January 19, 2007No. Civil No. 394/2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKendall, Judge

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

(January 19, 2007)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Order denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (hereinafter “Motion for Reconsideration”) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon review and consideration of the Motions, and arguments presented at the Hearing of December 13, 2006, the Motion for Reconsideration is denied and the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted based upon the reasons set forth below.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Revised Organic Act of 1954, as amended, (hereinafter “R.O.A.”) provides…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Industrious Auto, Inc. v. RogersDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API