Legal Opinion

Ettlinger v. Kruger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 11, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Louis Ettlinger against Theodore Kruger. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

One Sylvester L. H. Ward leased the premises in suit to Theodore Kruger by a written lease dated December 31, 1896, for a term of five years; the tenant covenanting to pay, in addition to the rent reserved, the annual water taxes. By various written extensions, the said lease was extenled to February 1, 1912, with increase of rent and the letting of additional adjoining space; the annual rental finally agreed upon being $7,100 per annum. There was no covenant in the lease against assigning or subletting without the land-r lord’s consent. The defendant, Kruger, occupied the said premises,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Sherman v. EngelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  3. Tallman v. EarleNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Triest & Co. v. GoldstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ettlinger v. KrugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API