Legal Opinion
Hough v. Stockbridge
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 8, 2002No. 26403-0-II, 26407-2-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 P.3d 192 (2002)
113 Wash.App. 532
Robert M. HOUGH and Diana L. Hough, Appellants,
v.
Frank W. STOCKBRIDGE and Susan Stockbridge, Respondents.
Nos. 26403-0-II, 26407-2-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 20, 2002.
As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration November 8, 2002.
Robert M. Hough, Tacoma, WA, Pro se Appellant.
Frank W. Stockbridge, Susan Stockbridge, Tacoma, WA, Pro se Respondent.
PUBLISHED OPINION
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
Robert and Diana Hough petitioned the Pierce County District Court to obtain a civil antiharassment protection order against their neighbors, Frank and Susan…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trummel v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Trummel v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Barber v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Morrison v. Basin Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Morrison v. Basin Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.