Legal Opinion

Patterson v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1993No. A057729PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, Acting P. J.

Defendants, ITT Consumer Financial Corporation, Aetna Finance Company, ITT Lyndon Property Insurance Company, ITT Lyndon Life Insurance Company, and John M. Higgins (collectively ITT), appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration and prohibiting them from confirming arbitration awards in the City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiffs Abbe Kanarek Patterson et al., are individuals who borrowed money from defendant finance companies and who, in connection with those loans, purchased insurance policies from defendant insurers.

In September 1991…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  5. Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API