Legal Opinion
Schuster v. City of Clinton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 13, 1953No. 35804PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Justice.
This is a proceeding by Clarence Schuster to review an order of the State Industrial Commission denying him compensation on a claim filed against his employer City of Clinton.
The facts are stipulated. They are: Petitioner, Clarence Schuster, was in the employ of the City of Clinton Garbage Department on September 26, 1951. On that day while engaged in performing duties incumbent upon him as a garbage collector for the City of Clinton he received an accidental personal injury which resulted in the loss of his right hand above the wrist and below the elbow. The accident occurred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Carter v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- City of Tulsa v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- State ex rel. Remy v. AgarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Cravatt v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- H. & R. Disposal Service v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974