Legal Opinion

Sands v. Brock Candy Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mb. Speoiad Justice B. A. Davis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The two plaintiffs in error, acting through their guardian, are the dependent grandchildren of C. M. Sands, who met his death in June, 1934, under such facts as made his employer, Brock Candy Company, liable for the compensation fixed by the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1932, sec. 6851 et seq.). The employee’s weekly wages amounted to $19.50. In the month following his death, a joint petition was filed by the surviving widow, and the employer, in which the death, wages, and right to compensation were conceded; this petition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cherokee Brick Co. v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. FendnallTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Pruden Coal & Coke Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Duff v. Black Diamond CollieriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Pioneer-Jellico Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Whitwell Coal Corp. v. CornettTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Aarene Contracting, LLC v. Krispy Kreme DoughnutCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  4. Ellenburg v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ellenburg v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API