Legal Opinion

People v. Yarbrough

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided April 11, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rothenberg, C. M.

Defendant is charged with a violation of section 167 of the Labor Law, as amended by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1937, reading as follows: “When any driver of a motor, truck or motor bus shall have been on duty continuously for ten' *770hours or at separate intervals for ten (10) hours in the aggregate or less in any fourteen consecutive hours including time for meals, even though part of such time shall have been outside of the State of New York he shall not continue or again go on duty without having had at least eight consecutive hours off duty. The periods of release from duty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Larabee Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. E. Fougera & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. People Ex Rel. Rayland Realty Company, Inc. v. . FaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DawsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1955
  2. The Matter of Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association v. New York State Department of TransportationNew York Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API