Legal Opinion

Ladd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1981No. WD 32175PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Michael Ladd moved under Rule 27.26 to set aside his convictions for armed robbery and assault and the resultant sentences aggregating 45 years. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief and Ladd appeals.

The point raised on this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying the post-conviction motion because Ladd’s trial attorney was ineffective in failing to call a defense witness to support Ladd’s alibi and in failing to seek a change of venue. The point has no merit and the judgment is affirmed.

The standard for appellate review in cases of post-conviction…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Vaughan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Charles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. MacE v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Porter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Franklin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Pinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Battle v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
  5. Bolden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API