Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.
This appeal presents to the court the question whether the enactment by a municipal corporation of an ordinance, later declared invalid by the Supreme Court, is a fraudulent act which denies to the municipal corporation the right to raise the defense of statute of limitations when sued by an employee not a party to the action in which the ordinance was declared void. We believe it is not, and affirm the action of the three-judge Workmen’s Compensation Court which dismissed appellant’s petition seeking workmen’s compensation benefits on the basis that the statute of limitations had run against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbott v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Pester v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Chappelear v. Grange & Farmers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Shandy v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Circle 76 Fertilizer, Inc. v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Cillessen Construction Co. v. Scotts Bluff County Housing AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Teague v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Agrex, Inc. v. City of SuperiorNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
- Baker v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.