Legal Opinion

Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1982No. 81-703PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

This appeal presents to the court the question whether the enactment by a municipal corporation of an ordinance, later declared invalid by the Supreme Court, is a fraudulent act which denies to the municipal corporation the right to raise the defense of statute of limitations when sued by an employee not a party to the action in which the ordinance was declared void. We believe it is not, and affirm the action of the three-judge Workmen’s Compensation Court which dismissed appellant’s petition seeking workmen’s compensation benefits on the basis that the statute of limitations had run against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Abbott v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pester v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Chappelear v. Grange & Farmers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Shandy v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Circle 76 Fertilizer, Inc. v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cillessen Construction Co. v. Scotts Bluff County Housing AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Teague v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Agrex, Inc. v. City of SuperiorNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Baker v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API