Legal Opinion

Hillme v. Chastain

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2002No. 24350PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Brent Chastain, (“Chastain”) appeals from the First Amended Judgment and Order Appointing Special Master rendered by the Circuit Court of Lac-lede County after a bench trial. The trial court found that a partnership existed between Chastain and Respondent, Douglas Hillme (“Hillme”), ordered an accounting and appointed a special master to assist in the process. 1 In his sole point on appeal, Chastain maintains there was insufficient evidence supporting the trial court’s judgment finding that a partnership existed between himself and Hillme.

“Appellate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Brady v. PettitKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Grissum v. ReesmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Arnold v. ErkmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Binkley v. PalmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norber v. MarcotteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Nathan Reuter v. Tana CutcliffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Cutcliff v. Reuter (In Re Reuter)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2010
  4. H2O'C LTD. v. BrazosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Bader Farms, Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API