Legal Opinion

Hazleton v. Le Duc

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 2, 1897No. 590PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This is an action of assumpsit brought in the court below by the appellee, William G. Le Due, against the appellant, George C. Hazelton, to recover damages for the breach of an alleged contract by which it is claimed that appellant agreed to purchase from appellee a certain house and lot in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, known as lot numbered 46, in square numbered 199. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against appellant for the sum of $2,900; and…

Read the full summary

This is an action of assumpsit brought in the court below by the appellee, William G. Le Due, against the appellant, George C. Hazelton, to recover damages for the breach of an alleged contract by which it is claimed that appellant agreed to purchase from appellee a certain house and lot in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, known as lot numbered 46, in square numbered 199. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against appellant for the sum of $2,900; and he appealed to this court, alleging certain errors in the rulings of the trial justice in admitting evidence, and in…

1Opinion of the Court

Contracts for Sale of Land; Statute of Frauds; Attorney and Client ; Ratification of Attorney’s Act ; Evidence ; Pleading and Practice; Tender; Waiver; Measure of Damages.

1. Quiere, whether an agreement is valid within the Statute of Frauds, if signed by the party to be charged, although unsigned and not binding upon the other party.

2. When the holder of second deed of trust notes sends the notes to an attorney for collection, and property upon which they are secured is bid in by the attorney for his client at a sale under a first deed of trust, and a contract for the sale of the land is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Holker v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  4. Taylor v. LongworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  5. Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Soldano v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953
  3. Downing v. H. G. Smithy Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Harrington v. HeaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Behles v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API