Legal Opinion

Wier v. Grubb

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 31, 1949No. 38714PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

This is a suit to cancel a mineral sublease and for damages and attorney’s fees.

The plaintiff bases his action on the alleged failure of the defendants to develop the leased tract, in accordance with the terms of the sublease granted by plaintiff to defendant Grubb. He prays for judgment in his favor and against defendants, jointly and in solido, for the forfeiture of the sublease as well as the cancellation of the sales and assignments thereof, for the surrender of the area which defendants have refused to develop (except as to the area of five acres around the lone producing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Payne v. WalmsleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Hutchinson v. Atlas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Farrell v. SimmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wier v. GrubbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Brown v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Tinsley v. Seismic Explorations, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.C. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Tidelands Royalty "B" Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API