Legal Opinion

Townsend v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1993No. 62063PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial, without evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

On August 6, 1991, movant pled guilty to two counts of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine, in violation of § 195.211.1 RSMo (Supp.1990), and one count of possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, in violation of § 195.202.1 RSMo (Supp. 1990). On September 6, 1991, movant appeared in court for sentencing. Pursuant to a plea agreement, movant was sentenced to concurrent terms totalling nine years.

Movant filed a timely pro se Rule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Fox v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Evans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Trehan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Estes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Morrison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API