Legal Opinion

Strait v. Wilkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1914No. Civ. No. 1472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was prosecuted for the purpose of securing damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff through the failure of defendants to convey certain real property. Judgment was in favor of the defendants, and a motion for a new trial having been made, this appeal was taken from the judgment and from the order denying the motion.

On the nineteenth day of June, 1907, plaintiff and defendant Mary A. Wilkins entered into a contract, which was expressed in writing, whereby an exchange of properties was agreed to be made. In that agreement it was recited that the property of plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. SayreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stewart v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sweet v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Kulm v. Coast-To-Coast Stores Central Organization, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Roberts v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. Sweet Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  5. City of Enid v. MoyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API