Legal Opinion

State v. Hodges

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2002No. 20010668PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

¶ 1 This is an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order that it has jurisdiction over the criminal prosecution of defendant, who had reached his twenty-first birthday when the proceedings were commenced, but who was under age eighteen at the time of his alleged crimes.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The State charges that defendant Daniel Lamont Hodges committed six first degree felony crimes involving sexual abuse of a child when Hodges was younger than eighteen years old. The alleged victim reported the crimes about three months prior to defendant’s twenty-first birthday. The State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Musser v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. State v. BurnsUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MusserUtah Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. BarrenNevada Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API