Legal Opinion
Lentjes Bischoff GmbH v. Joy Environmental Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 1997No. 97 Civ. 6296(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
On September 29, 1997, plaintiff Lentjes Bischoff GmbH (“Bisehoff’) filed an Order to Show Cause pursuant to Rules 30, 34 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for expedited discovery and a preliminary injunction requiring defendant Joy Environmental Technologies, Inc. (“Joy”) to provide it with a letter of credit in the amount of $10.7 million to replace a letter of credit in the same amount set to expire on October 31, 1997. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs motions are denied.
I. Factual Background
The following facts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Jsg Trading Corp. v. Tray-Wrap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Roso-Lino Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,417 Stephen Blumenthal and Les Fein v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Naacp v. Town Of East HavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gidatex, S.R.L. v. Campaniello Imports, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Espeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Marathon Outdoor, LLC v. VescontiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Al Nawasi Trading Co. v. BP Amoco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Zea v. GriffithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025