Legal Opinion

Reeder v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1905No. 13,814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Charles T. Dickinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

Block 66, in Credit Foncier Addition to the city of Omaha, is bounded on the east by Sixth street, on the north by Center street, on the west by Seventh street and on the south by Cedar street. A deep ravine enters said block near the southeast corner, extending across the same and, as we understand, across Seventh street into the block west. Some 20 years ago or more the city graded Sixth and Cedar streets, filling the ravine at the intersection of these two streets at the southeast corner of block 66. Because of a failure on the part of the city to make adequate provision for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. ConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Omaha v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. City of Omaha v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. City of Omaha v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Griswold v. HazelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Davoren v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API