Legal Opinion

United States v. Porat

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 3, 1994No. Nos. 93-1095, 93-1176, 93-1242 and 93-1243PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

On March 3, 1992, a grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania indicted Amir Porat on two counts of making material false declarations before a 1989 grand jury investigating antitrust violations between Po-rat’s company, IM, Inc. (IM), and Fraass Survival Systems, Inc. (Fraass).

Count One charged that Porat made a false statement when he denied receiving a $200,000 check issued by Fraass to Credit Suisse, a bank located in Switzerland. Count Two charged that Porat made a false state*662ment when he denied ever having a personal bank account…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Charles Randell GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Isa Yusufu, A/K/A Uni Kano, A/K/A David BarbarineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Garcia-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API