Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Fahl

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1916No. 9,038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Action by Jeptba Crouch and others against George S. Fahl and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, C. J.

The following undisputed facts are disclosed by the record: On January 14, 1911, appellants sold and delivered to' appellee George S._ Fahl a certain stallion .at an agreed price of $2,500, for which amount Fahl executed his two promissory notes, each in the sum of $1,250, payable with six per cent, interest January 14, 1912, and January 14, 1913, respectively. To secure the payment of the notes Fahl executed a chattel mortgage on the horse. The mortgage was duly recorded. As a part of the transaction of sale, appellants executed to Fahl a certain written guaranty or warranty hereinafter set…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Oltmanns Bros. v. PolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Merchants National Bank v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Highsmith v. HammondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maple v. Seaboard Surety CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Puget Sound MacHinery Depot v. ClappWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API