Legal Opinion

Dorais v. Doll

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1905No. 2,188PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; E. W. Barney, Judge. Action by D. Doráis against George B. Doll and others. From the judgment and an order denying.him a new trial, defendant Con. Fleming, administrator of the estate of T. P. Fleming, deceased, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This action was commenced by one Louis Dupuis to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a settlement between the parties for ice sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendants. At the time the transactions occurred out of which the controversy arose, T. P. Fleming, with his codefendants George E. Doll, T. E. Fitzgerald and W. 0. Fisk, were dealing in ice in the city of Butte, under the firm name of the “Consumers’ Pure Ice Company.” During the pendency of the action, Dupuis for value assigned his claim to Doráis, who was substituted as plaintiff in his stead. The three defendants, other *316than…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Christiansen v. AldrichMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Jorgenson v. Butte & Montana Commercial Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. De Celles v. CaseyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. Johnson v. Gallatin Valley Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Sandeen v. Russell Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Callan v. HampleMontana Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API