Charland v. Little Six, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs objections to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge John M. Mason dated July 21, 2000 In his report, the magistrate judge recommended that defendant’s motions for Rule 11 sanctions be granted, and that counsel for plaintiff be ordered to pay to defendants the sum of $19,173.17. Plaintiff strenuously objects to the magistrate judge’s conclusions. However, the court fully agrees both with the magistrate judge’s analysis of the Rule 11 issues and the fact that a sanction should be imposed. An attorney’s decision…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries, Ingersoll-Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shingobee Builders, Inc. v. N. Segment AllianceUnited States District Court · 2018
- Nguyen v. FoleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Nguyen v. FoleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Tornquist v. Spirit Mountain Gaming, Inc.Grand Ronde Tribal Court · 2002
- Wolfchild v. Redwood CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015