Legal Opinion

Wolfchild v. Redwood County

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 9, 2015No. Civil No. 14-1597 (MJD/FLN)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER

MICHAEL J., DAVIS, Chief Judge.

I. Summary of Decision

In this case, Plaintiffs seek possessory rights and damages concerning a twelve square mile area of land in southwestern Minnesota. In order to obtain such relief, Plaintiffs sought to eject an Indian Tribe from .reservation lands and seventy-five private landowners, who, together with their ancestors, have possessed the land at issue for over one hundred and fifty years.

Prior to bringing this action, Plaintiffs and them counsel, Erick Kaardal, litigated related claims against the United States before the Court of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API