Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Ash Removal Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1935No. 42439Published

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff was incorporated for the purpose, as stated in its certificate of incorporation, of carrying oil a general contracting business in all its branches. During its entire corporate existence, it has beeu engaged exclusively in the reception, transportation, and final disposition of garbage, ashes, street sweepings, and rubbish in the borough of Brooklyn under successive contracts with the city of New York, the contract involved in this suit being a five-year contract which commenced April 1, 1928, and terminated March 31, 1933. The only income to plaintiff during 1929…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. City of Denver v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API