Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1998No. 40A04-9703-CR-90PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Following a jury trial, Paul Jordan was convicted of Inducing Votes by Gift or Offer to Compensate, a Class D felony. He was sentenced to an executed term of one and one-half years, with all but thirty days suspended. Jordan now appeals.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Jordan presents several issues for our review which we consolidate and restate as:

1. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support Jordan’s conviction.

2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to compel Jordan’s requested discovery.

FACTS

On October 9,1995, Candice Huber attended a voter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matheney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hurt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Guy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Hendricks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Shanabarger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Ratliff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API