Legal Opinion

McCorker v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2003No. 45S05-0305-CR-224PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Christopher McCorker appeals his multiple convictions for robbery and confinement and his resulting sentence of 65 years. Our principal concern in this case is a jury instruction that Defendant contends, and the Court of Appeals agreed, relieved the State of its burden of proof by creating an impermissible mandatory presumption. Although we find the instruction to have been inartfully worded in several respects, we affirm the convictions because the instruction is a correct statement of law. To the extent the instruction creates a mandatory presumption, it is a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bruce Ryan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Daniel Brewington v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Marq Hall v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Benefield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Whiting v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API