Legal Opinion

Reyna v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1925No. 7316Published

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Defendant in error, Jose Maria Gonzales, instituted suit September 26, 1923, to recover $2,171.56, alleged to have been appropriated by palintiff in error without his consent while plaintiff in error was his bookkeeper, setting forth in his petition the dates and amounts in which the money was taken. Plaintiff in error admitted having taken said amounts claimed by defendant in error, and alleged that the same were taken with the consent and knowledge of defendant in error by virtue of a certain agreement had with' defendant in error. Plaintiff in error alleged, by way of cross-action and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Traders National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Steed v. PettyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Sanders v. BridgesTexas Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API