Legal Opinion

Cal-Agrex, Inc. v. Tassell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 13, 2009No. C-07-0964 SCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The parties tried this matter before a jury, beginning on January 13, 2009, and concluding on January 22, 2009. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff, Cal-Agrex, Inc. (“Cal-Agrex” or “Plaintiff’), and awarded damages in the amount of $2,501,595. See Docket No. 207 (“Verdict”). The Court subsequently entered Judgment in accordance with the jury’s decision. Docket No. 209. Now before the Court are three motions, each timely filed and fully briefed. In the first motion, Defendants…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Santos v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ACTCA, a Member of the Alliance, Inc. v. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2024
  2. KPM Analytics North America Corporation v. Blue Sun Scientific, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API