Legal Opinion

Salem Transportation Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 16, 1967No. 67-Civ. 2971Published

1Opinion of the Court

CROAKE, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM

This is a motion by D & M Taxi Company, Inc. (D & M) to intervene as of right in the case of Salem Transportation Co., Inc. (SALEM) v. United States, 67 Civ. 2971. SALEM brought the present action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Ch. 157 to review adverse determinations by the Interstate .Commerce Commission (I.C.C.) in SALEM’S Docket Nos. MC-107583 sub 17 and sub 18. See 100 M.C.C. 373. D & M, although not a party to the proceedings before the I.C.C., asserts that its status as a competitor of SALEM makes it an “interested” party within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2323…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. United Transports, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API