Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Malloy

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided December 30, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 5352PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDDY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation, both Delaware corporations, against the Vermont State Commissioner of Motor Vehicles and his Deputy Commissioner for an injunction restraining the Commissioner from requiring approval of an auxiliary headlamp known as “Super Lite”, mounted in certain 1969 Dodge automobiles and from interfering with the sale of such automobiles within the State of Vermont. Plaintiffs contend that the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1425 (Supp. II 1966), has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. TofanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Chrysler Corporation, and Chrysler Motors Corporation v. Robert W. Rhodes, Fred L. Johnson, and Frederick L. Clarke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  3. General Motors Corporation v. VolpeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  4. Springfield Television, Inc. v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Truck Safety Equipment Institute v. KaneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API