Wagner v. Sanders Associates, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR AN ORDER SPECIFYING MATERIAL FACTS EXISTING WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL CONTROVERSY
LETTS, District Judge.
Defendant Sanders Associates, Inc. has moved for summary judgment on one cause of action, and for an order specifying material facts existing without substantial controversy, in this employment action filed by Plaintiff Richard Wagner. Oral argument was held on April 28, 1986. After reviewing all materials submitted in connection with this motion, and having heard arguments of counsel, the Court has decided that the motion should be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- 22 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1191, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,891 Claudette T. Bourque, Cross v. Powell Electrical Manufacturing Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Israel Alicea Rosado v. Ramon Garcia SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Janiece S. NOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph Maxwell CLELAND, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Carole WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Patrick H. King v. Ac & R Advertising Saatchi & Saatchi Company Plc Alvin Chereskin Harry J. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cothern v. Vickers, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Soules v. Cadam, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.