Legal Opinion

Hopson v. Ætna Axle & Spring Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Petition for the foreclosure of a mortgage; brought to the Superior Court. Facts found by a committee and decree passed (Stoddard, -J.') Appeal by the defendants. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is a petition to foreclose a mortgage given by the respondents to the petitioners and J. M. Bullock, Samuel Wilmot and Henry Buckingham, dated October 80th, 1872. The condition, so far as it is material, is as follows:—“ Whereas J. M. Bullock, Samuel Wilmot, Henry Buckingham, George Hopson and George B. Waller have this day jointly endorsed a certain promissory note, bearing even date herewith, made and signed by the grantor in this deed, in and by which the said grantor promised to pay to its own order on demand the sum of forty thousand dollars, with interest at the rate of seven per…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MortensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Peteler Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Standard Cotton Seed Oil Co. v. Excelsior Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Gordon v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Savage v. Madelia Farmers' Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API