Legal Opinion

Jaeger v. Mitchell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1936No. Calendar 38,610PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Defendant seeks mandamus to compel the trial judge to set aside an order granting a motion for a new trial in a malpractice case in which defendant prevailed. The negligence charged consisted of defendant’s neglect in diagnosing and treating an injury caused by a fall. Defendant testified that at the time the plaintiff engaged him, he advised an X-ray examination, but that plaintiff refused to submit to one because, as she informed him, she had fallen on prior occasions and that her present injury was merely a bruise. On cross-examina tion, plaintiff testified that she never had suffered any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Detroit Tug & Wrecking Co. v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Ætna Live Stock Fire & Tornado Insurance v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. People v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People ex rel. Shimer v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. O'Brien v. Judge of Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Poundstone v. Niles CreameryMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hoad v. MacOmb Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Medlock v. MerrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Medlock v. MerrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API