Legal Opinion

Vedutis v. Tesi

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 3, 1975PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

135 N.J. Super. 337 (1975)

343 A.2d 171

DONNA VEDUTIS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROBERT VEDUTIS, AND ROBERT VEDUTIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ROGER TESI, SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, MURIEL KING AND WILLIAM KING, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided July 3, 1975.

Mr. Steven D. Altman for plaintiffs (Messrs. Mulligan and Altman, attorneys).

Mr. Robert F. Colquhoun for defendant South Plainfield Board of Education.

DEMOS, A.J.S.C.

This matter comes before the court on motions by infant plaintiff Donna Vedutis and by plaintiff Robert Vedutis, her father, to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. NJ Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. BlairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Markey v. SkogNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. City of Clifton v. Passaic County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Fuller v. Rutgers, State UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. PepperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Lameiro v. West New York Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Hill v. Middletown Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API