Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Day

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1990No. 221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. After a careful review of the parties’ briefs and the applicable law, we affirm.

The record indicates that sometime prior to April 24, 1987, the appellant Eugene Day was charged with receiving stolen property and theft. Julius Williams, the victim in the instant case, was scheduled to testify against Day regarding those charges. According to Williams, Day threatened him during the time that the charges were pending. N.T., May 3, 1989, at 45-81.1 Williams testified that Day…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. TerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. ManceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Com. v. ManceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API