Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1993No. 1610PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to further define when police conduct during a reverse sting operation becomes so outrageous as to violate due process. A reverse sting is an undercover operation in which the government agents pretend to be selling (rather than as is the more usual case, buying) illicit drugs from the soon-to-be defendants. United States v. Ruiz, 927 F.2d 139 (3d Cir.1991). It is a recognized investigative tool used in law enforcement against middle-level illicit drug dealers.

Charles A. Manee appeals from the judgment of sentence following his jury convictions for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. CargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. United States v. Duane R. Olson, Also Known as Duke, and George MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. ShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Bomar, A., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. MarionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. ManceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. BrehmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API