Commonwealth v. Mance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
In this appeal we are asked to further define when police conduct during a reverse sting operation becomes so outrageous as to violate due process. A reverse sting is an undercover operation in which the government agents pretend to be selling (rather than as is the more usual case, buying) illicit drugs from the soon-to-be defendants. United States v. Ruiz, 927 F.2d 139 (3d Cir.1991). It is a recognized investigative tool used in law enforcement against middle-level illicit drug dealers.
Charles A. Manee appeals from the judgment of sentence following his jury convictions for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- United States v. Duane R. Olson, Also Known as Duke, and George MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Bomar, A., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MarionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ManceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BrehmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.