Mix v. Gem Investors, Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This appeal raises the issue of whether the sale of an airline is subject to the bulk transfer provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, as adopted in Idaho. The district court held that it was not, and entered judgment dismissing the claim of Mrs. Mix (an unsecured creditor of the airline) as against the purchaser of the airline. We affirm.
The facts in this matter are not disputed. In 1975 Mrs. Mix, sometimes doing business as “Ad 1,” contracted with Gem State Air lines Inc. to provide advertising and public relations services for the airline. This agreement lasted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gavica v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HochIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Tax Exemption of Sunset Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Bannock v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Ex Parte Harsco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- State v. NabIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- Howard v. Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bailey v. North Sails Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.