Legal Opinion

Meurer Steel Barrel Co. v. Boyle Mfg. Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 14, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, owner of patent No. 891,895 to Young, sues, charging infringement thereof and praying fot an accounting. The patent has expired since the commencement of the action. It relates “to metal or steel barrels, or similar receptacles, in which the heads, formed separately from the body, are secured to the latter in such manner that a fluid-tight receptacle is provided*- this being accomplished in an improved manner by means of a malleable iron clamping ring.” The pateqt has been held valid in prior litigation. Meurer Steel Barrel Co. v. National, etc., Co. (D. C.)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howard v. Detroit Stove WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. American Lava Co. v. StewardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Toledo Plate & Window Glass Co. v. Kawneer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API