Legal Opinion

Gillentine v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 2, 1989No. 01-88-01114-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

After a bench trial, the court found appellant guilty of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated, and assessed his punishment at two years probation and a fine of $300.

In his sole point of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erroneously admitted the police officer’s observations about appellant’s physical condition at the time of his arrest, and appellant’s response to field sobriety tests. Appellant argues that this evidence was the product of an illegal pretext arrest, and should, therefore, have been excluded under the fourth amendment to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Salcido v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pannell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  2. Gaines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  3. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Frederick Paul Peterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  5. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Janice Johnson Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API