Legal Opinion

Wireman v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 22, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Sims, Commissioner

— Reversing.

The appellant, Charlie Wireman, was jointly in-dieted with Bud Wireman and Jim Dunn for the malicious shooting and wounding of Ulysses Reed, a negro. Upon a separate trial he was convicted and his punishment was fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years. On this appeal he assigns four errors: 1. Competent evidence was excluded; 2. the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence; 3. the instructions are erroneous; 4. the jury should have been allowed to view the scene of the shooting.

At the time of the difficulty appellant was a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maggard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Cox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Poe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Pelfrey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Lexington v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  2. State v. ClydeHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Penix v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  4. Chinn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  5. Couch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API