Legal Opinion

Mote v. Seitz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 1963No. 40362PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

Ground 4 of the amended motion for a new trial assigns error on the admission in evidence of “defendant’s Exhibit 2.” The exhibit is not attached to nor otherwise described or identified in the recitals of fact in this special ground, nor is there any reference to its location in the record by page number. The ground is accordingly too incomplete for consideration. Mutual Benefit Health &c. Assn. of Omaha v. Hickman, 100 Ga. App. 348, 364 (111 SE2d 380). Ground 6, which complains that the judgment entered in this case is broader than the verdict and the relief sought by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whatley v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Partain v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Ray v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API